Template talk:Artwork

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day. For the archive overview, see Special:PrefixIndex/Template talk:Artwork/Archiv. The latest archive is located at /Archiv/2024.

Template incorrectly changing "vandalism" to "damaged"

[edit]

If the object history in Wikidata says that a painting was vandalized, this template changes that to "damaged" which is very different. For example, the Mona Lisa has been vandalized half a dozen times, but most of the incidents resulted in no damage to the painting. Nosferattus (talk) 03:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for bringing this up. I agree, it's not the same. This needs fixing in Module:Wikidata art. --Marsupium (talk) 16:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If there was no damage, then by definition it wasn't vandalised. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wrong linking to c:File:Rogier Lamp.jpg

[edit]

c:File:Rogier Lamp.jpg is linked to another item Annunciation (Q29648480), can one change this please. Oursana (talk) 11:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong display of temporary exhibitions with more than one location

[edit]

Hey, I created the Wikidata item for File:"Portrait d'Ivan A. Morozov" de K. Korovine (Fondation Louis Vuitton, Paris).jpg and also implemented the Artwork template in the image description. Unfortunatly the exhibition history is displaced wrong. It misses the fact that the exhibition took place in "Pushkin Museum" AND "Berlinische Galerie" and that one of the start and end date applies to Pushkin Museum and one to Berlinische Galerie.
It's not a big error and probably complicated to correct, but if anyone finds the time would still be nice. Thanks!! Carl Ha (talk) 12:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This could and should indeed be repaired. The responsible code is Module:Wikidata art's p.get_object_history(). I hope we can fix it sometime soon and hopefully even evaluate the applies to part (P518) qualifiers on Berlin–Moscow/Moscow–Berlin 1900–1950 (Q130251219). --Marsupium (talk) 07:44, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weird template display

[edit]

Hi all. I was checking this file, and the Artwork template as of September 15, 9:00 (BRT), is displaying weirdly, apparently due to some connection to Wikidata. Could someone with relevant skills take a look please? Thanks. Joalpe (talk) 11:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The template that was put in the title by Mike Peel is apparently way too complex. I don’t think the title is the place for authority control, and would simply revert that edit, but I’d like to hear Mike’s opinion first. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 16:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
With @Ederporto: 's approval, I've now migrated all uses of Template:Authority control/wikidata and deleted it, since Artwork now handles everything that it was intended to do. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

adding object type

[edit]

Can someone please add this string to the copy-and-paste example on the page?

 |object type        =

Micione (talk) 23:38, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Micione: Template:Artwork/doc is not protected; you should be able to do so yourself. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:27, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pigsonthewing: I tried, but I didn't get it. --Micione (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done here; please see if you can add additional detail. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pigsonthewing: Thank you! --Micione (talk) 22:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pigsonthewing: I noticed that object type was already number 5, between title and description, where I think it's best, but it didn't appear in the example. Is it possible to make it appear as number 5 in the example? --Micione (talk) 13:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just noticed the same just before coming here and reading your comment. :-) Done with this edit. --Marsupium (talk) 16:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Marsupium: Perfect, thank you! --Micione (talk) 18:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]